Skip to content
decosa

Make a cleared song

Music for ads, games and creators with a paper trail. A prompt guard refuses or strips named artists, songs, labels and voice imitation (code rules, then one receipted typed judgment), the track renders on MiniMax-Music3 or ACE-Step, and a CPU check scores it against a catalogue of openly licensed recordings. Each track ships with a C2PA credential and a signed certificate that states the model, seed, checks, similarity score and the exact licence.

For
Teams in music and creative and media.
  • Time per task43 stypical (median) on the sample
  • Cost per task~$0.011 per trackmeasured, at list price
  • Accuracy100% (48/48)Prompt guard precision (refuse)All results and caveats
  • Self-hostRun it on your own server: nothing is sent to us or anyone else.
  • HostedUse it on our servers; see where your data goes.

Brief

When the prompt names someone

A guard and a triage check, not a rights clearance. MiniMax-Music3 output must be credited "Powered by MiniMax-Music3". No copyright in the output is claimed: the US Copyright Office holds that prompts alone do not make a work protectable. Each demo session renders 3 tracks.

Result

Live

Write a brief and generate. The prompt check runs first; a refused prompt never reaches the GPU.

Check any track

Score a file from anywhere against the reference catalogue: 240 openly licensed recordings from the Free Music Archive. Try a pitch-shifted copy of one of them to see it flag. The file is checked in memory and not kept (20 MB at most).

What it does, in shortWho it's for, where it runs and the key results

Music for ads, games and creators with a paper trail. A prompt guard refuses or strips named artists, songs, labels and voice imitation (code rules, then one receipted typed judgment), the track renders on MiniMax-Music3 or ACE-Step, and a CPU check scores it against a catalogue of openly licensed recordings. Each track ships with a C2PA credential and a signed certificate that states the model, seed, checks, similarity score and the exact licence.

In short

Last reviewed

What it is
Music for ads, games and creators, with a prompt guard, a similarity check and a signed licence certificate for every track.
Who it's for
Teams in music and creative and media.
Where it runs
Hosted or self-host
Key numbers
  • 100% (48/48) Prompt guard precision (refuse) (test split, n = 79)
  • 98.0% (48/49) Prompt guard recall (refuse) (test split, n = 79)
  • 0 of 30 Safe prompts refused (test split, n = 30)
  • 42.7 s Median end-to-end run, hosted (QA sweep 2026-09-25)
All results, datasets and caveats
How we tested itEnd-to-end checks, hosted and self-hosted, with dates

Verified end to end

Hosted: verified 25 Sep 2026 · measured 25 Sep 2026: · p50 43 s · ~<$0.001 per run · 1 receipt

Loading the nightly status…

Self-host: verified 25 Sep 2026 · Fresh clone of the branch into a clean directory, docker build of the api image plus the documented FFmpeg and c2pa-python layer and of services/music_embed, compose with named volumes, pointed at the already-running local vLLM (direct route) and ComfyUI; then torn down.

Measured cost to run: about $0.011 per track (hosted, 25 Sep 2026). Self-hosting is free: the code is open and the models are open-weight. You pay only for your own hardware and power.

The guard refused and stripped as documented, a 30 s MiniMax-Music3 render finished in 21.4 s with a similarity verdict and a certificate that verified (and failed when edited), a planted near-copy scored 11.6 against the catalogue, and no prompt text reached the logs. Found on the way: the api image has no c2pa-python, so the first render had no C2PA credential; with the layer and the dev certificate, stamping inside the container produced a credential that validates.

Known limits (5)
  • The similarity check knows only 240 Creative Commons tracks and the files you compare; it flagged 81% of planted near-copies at 2% false alarms, and a clear result says nothing about commercial catalogues.
  • The guard reads text only: 98% recall on held-out prompts, and it cannot hear a melody someone describes or hums.
  • Renders share one GPU with the live demos: 3 per demo session, 3 per API key per day.
  • C2PA credentials are signed by a development CA: valid signature, untrusted issuer in public validators.
  • No copyright is claimed in the output; the certificate records checks and licence terms, not ownership.

Eval results, nightly checks and cost per run · held-out eval

Technical detailsModels, where it runs, labels, what it is built from
Models
MiniMax-Music3 · ACE-Step 1.5 · Qwen3.8-27B · LAION CLAP
Where
Hosted or self-host
Checks
Receipted prompt check; C2PA credential and signed licence certificate
Output
Media · Signed record or verdict
Data
No sensitive data
Hardware
1× 96 GB GPU
Licence
Includes community-licence models

Every result carries a signed record of which model produced it, so you can check it later. How that works

Questions people ask

Does this clear the rights in a generated track?

No. It is not legal advice and not a rights clearance. The similarity check compares the track with 240 openly licensed Free Music Archive recordings, or with a reference you send; a clear result says nothing about commercial catalogues it has never seen.

What happens if I ask for a named artist's sound?

The prompt guard refuses the request, or in strip mode removes the name and re-checks what is left. On 79 held-out synthetic prompts it refused 48 of 49 imitation prompts and none of 30 safe ones. Every refusal is logged with its rule.

Which licence covers each track?

The certificate names it: MIT for ACE-Step 1.5, or the MiniMax-Music3 Community License, which allows commercial use but requires showing "MiniMax-Music3" in a commercial UI, prior written authorization above USD 20M yearly revenue, and its acceptable use policy.

Is AI-generated music copyrighted?

The certificate claims no copyright. The US Copyright Office's Part 2 report (29 Jan 2025) says AI output is protected only where a human author determined sufficient expressive elements, and prompts alone are not enough. Other countries differ.

How well does the near-copy check work?

On the test split it flagged 80.8% of planted near-copies at the flag threshold (90.4% at the review threshold) with 2.3% false flags on unrelated tracks by new artists. About one planted copy in five slips under the flag, and lyrics are not compared.

Can I run it on my own GPU?

Yes. Self-hosted, nothing leaves your machine. Hosted, the brief goes to the text model through our gateway and to Decosa's render service; the prompt check costs about $0.0002 of model time per track.

Ask a question or leave feedbackWe read every message and publish useful answers
Questions & feedback

Ask about Rights-cleared music generation

We read every message. Questions, comments and our answers show here once we have reviewed and approved them.

Loading questions…

This is a

Plain text. Please leave out personal, patient or client data.

Shown with your message if we publish it. Leave blank to post as “A visitor”.

Nothing appears here until we have read and approved it.