{"schema_version":"1","site":"https://decosa.ai","id":"claims-conduct-pack","num":"54","name":"Insurance claims-file conduct pack","tool_name":"Review a claim file for conduct","short":"Claims conduct pack","blurb":"Reads a claim file and its policy the way a market-conduct examiner would, under the NAIC model, California (10 CCR 2695) or Texas (Ins. Code 542). It computes the acknowledgement, decision, status-letter and payment deadlines from the file's own dates, checks each denial reason for a cited provision and grounds it in the policy text, and looks for the Department of Insurance review notice. It gives typed judgments with quotes on misrepresentation, low offers and missing investigation, records any AI use, and seals it all in a signed file review a reviewer can sign off.","status":"live","labels":{"industry":["finance","compliance-trust"],"job":["review","attest"],"input":["text","files"],"deploy":["selfhost"],"status":"live","output":["record","data"],"data":["pii","confidential"],"hardware":"gpu-96","licence":"permissive"},"industries":["finance","compliance-trust"],"runs_in":["selfhost"],"part_of":[],"built_from":["grounding","typed-judgment","signed-record"],"models":"Qwen3.8-27B","where":"Self-host for real claim files (hosted demo: synthetic files only)","hardware":"1x RTX PRO 6000 (96 GB) for Qwen3.8-27B; the deadline rules and the record need no GPU","final_artifact":"A conduct checklist (flag, review, ok, n/a) with rules, dates and quotes, a Markdown file review, and a signed file review that a reviewer's sign-off points at.","self_host_first":true,"verification":{"receipt_coverage":"full","summary":"Receipt per model call; every quote and date checked against the file; signed hash-chained file review with each step marked rule, model or human","manual_qa":{"hosted":{"date":"2026-09-26","result":"pass","p50_ms":10100,"p95_ms":null,"runs":null,"receipts_per_run":5,"cost_per_run_usd":0.004},"selfhost":{"date":"2026-09-26","result":"pass","method":"fresh clone of decosa-api into a clean directory on our server, api image built from docker/api/Dockerfile, compose api service with a named data volume, direct route, local signing; torn down after","notes":"The assembly prompt's smoke tests passed against the already-running local Qwen3.8-27B vLLM (network_mode host instead of the compose llm service): the planted file flagged ack, reason:1 (quoting 'organized race or speed contest'), review_notice and misrepresent, 5 attested receipts, record verified, 5.0 s; the clean file had 0 flags; sign-off pointed at the first record; the rehearsal bundle passed 8/8. Model-server startup was not re-run."},"known_limits":["Hosted verification ran on the pre-release server (decosa-api the pre-release branch on our server, gateway route). The production API gets this vertical when the branch merges.","Measured on 84 synthetic, templated files written by the building agent; not on real claim files or with a claims auditor's labels.","Three rulepacks only (NAIC model, California, Texas). The NAIC pack is a baseline, not any state's law.","Business days skip weekends and US federal holidays; deadlines on weekends are not rolled forward, and one or two days late on such a deadline is marked review.","The reviewer's name on a sign-off is as given; identity is not verified."],"nightly_covers":null},"nightly":"https://api.decosa.ai/verify/status"},"eval_summary":{"metrics":[{"name":"Planted problems found, all checks","value":"52 of 54 (precision 0.98, recall 0.96)","unit":null,"n":54,"split":"test","note":"48 test files, run once after the prompts were frozen"},{"name":"False flags","value":"1","unit":null,"n":48,"split":"test","note":"A shortened flood exclusion called a misrepresentation"},{"name":"Clean files with any flag","value":"0 of 12","unit":null,"n":12,"split":"test","note":"Dev 0 of 7, replies 0 of 6, samples 0 of 2"},{"name":"Held-out phrasing files: found / false / missed","value":"26 / 0 / 0","unit":null,"n":24,"split":"heldout","note":"Sentences never seen while the prompts were written; denial-reason wordings are not held out"},{"name":"Timeliness items with the right start, act and deadline","value":"122 of 122","unit":null,"n":122,"split":"test","note":"Dev: 64 of 65"},{"name":"Late replies found (targeted replies set)","value":"6 of 6, 0 false flags","unit":null,"n":12,"split":"test","note":null}],"dataset":"Synthetic claim files for a fictional insurer from scripts/claims_cases.py: dev 24 files, test 48 (half with held-out phrasing), a targeted replies set of 12, and 6 demo samples; problems planted on a structured truth.","held_out":true,"caveats":["Synthetic, templated files: real claim files are longer and messier (scanned letters, email chains, several claimants). These numbers do not predict accuracy on a carrier's files.","The same author wrote the generator, the planted problems and the prompts.","Small positive counts for some checks: decision (2), review notice (2) and lowball (3) on the test set.","Denial-reason wordings are the same six in every set, so misquote detection is not held out on wording.","Rules are a subset (total-loss valuation, subrogation and others are not checked); no OCR in this build."],"date":"2026-09-26","doc_url":"https://decosa.ai/metrics/evals/claims-conduct-pack"},"stack":{"summary":"For claims-quality teams, chief compliance officers and TPAs. Give it a claim file (first notice of loss, adjuster notes, letters, estimates) and the policy wording, and pick the rules: the NAIC model (Model #900 and #902), California (10 CCR 2695) or Texas (Insurance Code ch. 542). It computes the acknowledgement, investigation, decision, status-letter, payment and reply deadlines from the dates in the file, each with the line it came from. It checks every denial reason for a cited provision, grounds the letter's statement of the policy in the policy text, and looks for the Department of Insurance review notice where the state requires it. It gives typed yes/no judgments with quotes on misrepresenting the policy, an offer below the insurer's own valuation with no reason in the file, and a denial without a documented investigation. It records any AI system that touched the claim and which steps were a model, a rule or a person, and seals it all in a signed file review; a reviewer's sign-off is a second signed record. Triage for a person, never a compliance finding.","tagline":"Every claim file read the way a market-conduct examiner reads it: deadlines from the file's own dates, denial reasons grounded in the policy, a signed file review.","deployment":"self-host-first","regulatory_note":"Rules read from primary texts on 26 Sep 2026. NAIC Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act (Model #900, adopted 1990, amended 1991) and Unfair Property/Casualty Claims Settlement Practices Model Regulation (Model #902, 1990, amended 1991): model laws that bind nobody until a state enacts them; #902 asks for acknowledgement within 15 days, a decision within 21 days of proof of loss or a written reason for more time, then a letter every 45 days, payment within 30 days, and a denial that references the provision it relies on. California Fair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations, 10 CCR 2695.5 and 2695.7 (operative 1993; 2695.7 last amended 14 Jul 2021): acknowledge, send forms and begin investigating within 15 calendar days, accept or deny within 40 calendar days of proof of claim or give written notice of the need for more time every 30 days, pay within 30 days, list every basis and the provision in a written denial, and tell the claimant they may have the matter reviewed by the California Department of Insurance, with its address and phone number. Texas Insurance Code 542.055 to 542.058 (eff. 1 Apr 2005): acknowledge within 15 days, accept or reject within 15 business days of receiving all items (or give reasons and decide within 45 days), state the reasons for a rejection, and pay within 5 business days. The NAIC Model Bulletin on the Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems by Insurers (adopted 4 Dec 2023) covers claim administration and says the Department may ask for documentation of AI systems used in decisions; it applies in a state once that state issues it. Business days skip weekends and US federal holidays, an assumption. Not legal advice.","components":[{"id":"llm","role":"Reads the file (dated events, denial reasons, amounts, AI mentions, each with a quote), grounds each denial reason in the policy, and answers the typed conduct questions","name":"Qwen3.8-27B (NVIDIA NVFP4)","hf_repo":"nvidia/Qwen3.8-27B-NVFP4","license":"Apache-2.0","params":"27.8B","quant":"NVFP4 (MLP) + FP8 (attention/GDN), FP8 KV cache, MTP speculative decoding k=3","vram_gb":57,"memory_gb_estimate":null,"engine":"vLLM 0.29.0","receipt_coverage":"strong","in_hosted_demo":true,"tiers":["standard"],"alternative_to":null},{"id":"llm-lite","role":"Lite tier: the same extraction, grounding and judgments on a 48 GB card","name":"Gemma 4 26B A4B (instruction-tuned)","hf_repo":"google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it","license":"Apache-2.0 (model card also links the Gemma 4 licence page)","params":"25.2B","quant":"BF16 weights; FP8 at load time (vLLM --quantization fp8) to fit a 48 GB card","vram_gb":null,"memory_gb_estimate":null,"engine":"vLLM 0.29.0 (Gemma4ForConditionalGeneration is in its model registry)","receipt_coverage":"none","in_hosted_demo":false,"tiers":["lite"],"alternative_to":null},{"id":"llm-best","role":"Best tier: a larger model for long, multi-claimant files","name":"DeepSeek-V4-Flash (NVIDIA NVFP4)","hf_repo":"nvidia/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-NVFP4","license":"MIT","params":"284B","quant":"NVFP4 experts + FP8 (about 159-176 GB of weights)","vram_gb":192,"memory_gb_estimate":null,"engine":"vLLM B12X community build, TP2 on 2x RTX PRO 6000, MTP draft fixed by the kit's patches","receipt_coverage":"none","in_hosted_demo":false,"tiers":["best"],"alternative_to":null},{"id":"glm-wanted","role":"Second judge, from another family","name":"GLM-5.3-Flash","hf_repo":"zai-org/GLM-5.3-Flash","license":"MIT","params":"321B","quant":"NVFP4 on NVIDIA (nvidia/GLM-5.3-Flash-NVFP4, about 170-186 GB, unconfirmed); MLX 4-bit on a Mac (165 GB)","vram_gb":null,"memory_gb_estimate":170,"engine":"SGLang SM120 build, TP2 on 2x 96 GB (vLLM is broken on sm_120 for this model, and the SGLang build hung on our server), or mlx-lm on a Mac with 192 GB or more","receipt_coverage":"none","in_hosted_demo":false,"tiers":["wanted"],"alternative_to":null}],"tiers":[{"id":"lite","label":"Lite · one 48 GB card","summary":"The same pipeline on a smaller mixture-of-experts model. Faster and cheaper; accuracy on this task unknown.","components":["llm-lite"],"hardware":"1x L40S or RTX 6000 Ada 48 GB (not measured)","quality_evidence":[{"metric":"planted problems flagged / false alarms","value":"not measured yet","source":null}],"latency_note":"not measured yet","in_hosted_demo":false,"receipt_coverage":"partial","receipt_note":"Direct route: calls are attested by the box's key; no gateway receipts.","hosting":null},{"id":"standard","label":"Standard · the hosted demo, one 96 GB card","summary":"Qwen3.8-27B reads the file, grounds the denial and answers the conduct questions; the deadlines are plain code. Every model call receipted.","components":["llm"],"hardware":"1x RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96 GB","quality_evidence":[{"metric":"held-out test, 48 synthetic files run once: planted problems flagged / false flags","value":"52/54 / 1","source":"decosa-api docs/evals/claims-conduct-pack.md, measured on our server 2026-09-26, gateway route; prompts frozen on a separate 24-file dev set; half the test files use phrasing never seen while writing the prompts (26/26 found there)"},{"metric":"clean files with any flag","value":"0/12 test, 0/7 dev, 0/6 replies, 0/2 samples","source":"decosa-api docs/evals/claims-conduct-pack.md, measured on our server 2026-09-26, gateway route"},{"metric":"date accuracy on the test set: events with the right date / timeliness items with the right start, act and deadline","value":"247/247 / 122/122","source":"decosa-api docs/evals/claims-conduct-pack.md, measured on our server 2026-09-26, gateway route"},{"metric":"per check on the test set (found/planted)","value":"acknowledgement 13/13, decision 2/2, payment 4/4, denial reason 11/12, review notice 2/2, misrepresentation 10/11 (1 false), low offer 3/3, investigation 7/7; late replies 6/6 on a 12-file targeted set","source":"decosa-api docs/evals/claims-conduct-pack.md, measured on our server 2026-09-26, gateway route"},{"metric":"AI use recorded, and whether a person was involved read right","value":"31/31","source":"decosa-api docs/evals/claims-conduct-pack.md, measured on our server 2026-09-26, gateway route"},{"metric":"real, de-identified claim files reviewed by a claims-quality auditor","value":"not measured yet","source":null}],"latency_note":"measured on our server under a shared gateway: seconds per file, longer at the slow end","in_hosted_demo":true,"receipt_coverage":"strong","receipt_note":"Hosted: gateway-signed receipt per model call. Self-hosted: attested by the box's key.","hosting":null},{"id":"best","label":"Best · DeepSeek-V4-Flash on two more cards","summary":"A larger model for long, multi-claimant files.","components":["llm-best"],"hardware":"2x RTX PRO 6000 96 GB","quality_evidence":[{"metric":"planted problems flagged / false alarms","value":"not measured yet","source":null}],"latency_note":"not measured yet","in_hosted_demo":false,"receipt_coverage":"partial","receipt_note":"Not a hosted model: calls are attested by the box's key only.","hosting":null},{"id":"wanted","label":"Wanted · two large judges from different families","summary":"DeepSeek-V4-Flash and GLM-5.3-Flash each read the file, and a finding stands when they agree; disagreements go to the reviewer. Claim files stay on your own hardware, never on community providers. Not served yet.","components":["llm-best","glm-wanted"],"hardware":"Your own hardware: 2x 96 GB cards for DeepSeek-V4-Flash plus 2x 96 GB for GLM-5.3-Flash, or one Mac Studio with 512 GB holding both 4-bit builds (156 + 165 GB, sizes from our Mac; not run together yet). Estimate.","quality_evidence":[{"metric":"planted problems flagged / false alarms","value":"not measured yet","source":null}],"latency_note":"not measured yet","in_hosted_demo":false,"receipt_coverage":"none","receipt_note":"On your own hardware its calls are attested by the box's key only: not a hosted model there, so no gateway receipts. Never sent to community providers.","hosting":"own-hardware"}],"alternates":[],"services":[{"name":"decosa-api","port":8445,"image":"${DECOSA_REGISTRY}/decosa-api:0.1.0","purpose":"File intake, extraction checks, the deadline rules, grounding, the judgments, signing and the HTTP API (/claims/*). No GPU. Binds 127.0.0.1 by default."},{"name":"decosa-llm","port":8000,"image":"${DECOSA_REGISTRY}/decosa-llm:0.1.0","purpose":"vLLM OpenAI endpoint for Qwen3.8-27B. Internal to the compose network."}],"tools":[{"name":"decosa grounding (vertical 17)","url":"https://decosa.ai/apps/grounding","license":"AGPL-3.0-or-later (decosa-api)","purpose":"Judges each denial reason's statement of the policy against the policy text and cites the span; imported, not copied."},{"name":"decosa typed-judgment (vertical 24)","url":"https://decosa.ai/apps/typed-judgment","license":"AGPL-3.0-or-later (decosa-api)","purpose":"Answer parsing and the stated-confidence probability for each conduct judgment."},{"name":"decosa record (vertical 07) and POST /record/verify","url":"https://decosa.ai/apps/record","license":"AGPL-3.0-or-later (decosa-api)","purpose":"The hash chain and the Ed25519-signed file review and sign-off; anyone can re-check them."},{"name":"NAIC Model #900 and Model #902","url":"https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/model-law-902.pdf","license":"NAIC publication (quoted for reference)","purpose":"The model rules; #900 at content.naic.org/sites/default/files/model-law-900.pdf."},{"name":"10 CCR 2695.5 and 2695.7 (California)","url":"https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/california/10-CCR-2695.7","license":"public law","purpose":"The California rulepack, read from Cornell LII's copy of the official CCR."},{"name":"Texas Insurance Code ch. 542","url":"https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/IN/htm/IN.542.htm","license":"public law","purpose":"The Texas prompt-payment rulepack."},{"name":"NAIC AI Model Bulletin (4 Dec 2023)","url":"https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/inline-files/2023-12-4%20Model%20Bulletin_Adopted_0.pdf","license":"NAIC publication","purpose":"Why the file review records which steps were a model, a rule or a person."}],"hardware":[{"tier":"1x RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96 GB","fits":true,"notes":"Measured: the hosted demo's Qwen3.8-27B runs on one of these cards on our server."},{"tier":"1x L40S / RTX 6000 Ada 48 GB","fits":null,"notes":"Not measured. FP8 Qwen3.8-27B with a shorter context, or Gemma 4 26B A4B (lite)."},{"tier":"CPU only","fits":true,"notes":"Date arithmetic, the notice check, the signed record and verification need no GPU; reading the file needs the model."}],"latency":[{"lane":"one claim file (3-6 documents), busy shared gateway","typical_ms":10100,"source":"decosa-api docs/evals/claims-conduct-pack.md, test set p50 on our server 2026-09-26 (p90 19.2 s), gateway route"},{"lane":"one claim file, self-hosted direct route","typical_ms":5000,"source":"measured on our server 2026-09-26, self-host sandbox, ca-auto-planted"},{"lane":"deadline rules and the signed record","typical_ms":50,"source":"estimate: no model call"}],"benchmark":{"title":"How well does it do on synthetic claim files?","intro":"84 synthetic files from a generator with planted problems (late acknowledgement, a clause misquoted, no review notice, a low offer, no investigation and more), across the NAIC, California and Texas rulepacks. Prompts were written on a 24-file dev set; the 48-file test set was run once.","rows":[{"label":"Planted problems flagged, test set","value":"52 of 54","detail":"1 false flag; the miss came back as review"},{"label":"Clean files with any flag","value":"0 of 27","detail":"test, dev, replies and demo sets together"},{"label":"Deadlines right end to end","value":"122 of 122","detail":"start date, act date and deadline, test set"},{"label":"Cost per file","value":"about $0.004","detail":"5 model calls, 9,351 tokens on the demo file, gateway list price"}],"points":[{"heading":"Where it fails","text":"Both errors are the model reading a letter against the policy: a letter that widened 'livery conveyance' to 'any business purpose' came back as review, not flag, and a letter that shortened the flood exclusion was called a misrepresentation."},{"heading":"What it does not show","text":"The files are templated and synthetic. Real files are longer and messier (scanned letters, email chains, several claimants). Measure it on your own closed files before relying on it."}],"source":"decosa-api docs/evals/claims-conduct-pack.md, 26 Sep 2026"},"notes":[]},"buyer_facts":[{"label":"What it checks","value":"Acknowledgement, investigation, decision, status-letter, payment and reply deadlines from the file's own dates; denial reasons (a cited provision that exists and says what the letter says); the Department of Insurance review notice; misrepresentation, low offers and missing investigation; AI use. Rulepacks: NAIC model, California, Texas."},{"label":"What it does not do","value":"It never says a file is compliant and does not decide coverage. Not checked: total-loss valuation, subrogation, statute-of-limitations notices, fraud-investigation extensions, surplus lines, 'final payment' wording, other states. Scanned letters need OCR first."},{"label":"Data retention","value":"Nothing kept on the server. Files, policies and records live in memory for the request; logs carry counts only. You keep the signed file review with the claim file."},{"label":"What leaves the box (hosted demo)","value":"The claim file and policy go to Qwen3.8-27B through the Decosa API, whose receipts hold hashes, not text. Self-hosted, nothing leaves. The hosted demo is for synthetic files only."},{"label":"Model calls per file","value":"One extraction, one grounding call per denial reason, and up to four typed judgments: 2 to 6 calls."},{"label":"Typical run cost","value":"A fraction of a cent at the gateway list price for the planted California file (a handful of model calls). Each run shows its own measured cost."},{"label":"Who did what","value":"The signed record marks each step as rule, model or human; a reviewer's confirm, dismiss or escalate decisions become a second signed record pointing at the first."}],"data_handling":{"page":"/data#claims-conduct-pack","self_host":{"level":"confidential","leaves":"nothing","summary":"Runs on your machine; nothing is sent to Decosa or a third party by default."},"hosted":{"level":"operator-processed","demo_only":true,"summary":"Hosted demo on sample or public data only; self-host for real data.","gpus":"operator-contracted","third_parties":[],"retention":"Nothing kept on the server. Files, policies and records live in memory for the request; logs carry counts only. You keep the signed file review with the claim file.","used_for_training":false,"encrypted_while_processed":false},"sealed_tier":{"applies":false,"note":"The sealed tier (raw chat only, never use-case pipelines) is paused at launch (/docs/sealed-tier)."},"external_calls":[]},"console":{"href":"/tools/finance/claims-conduct-pack","input":"claims","lanes":[{"id":"timeliness","title":"Timeliness","kind":"list"},{"id":"denial","title":"Denial letter","kind":"list"},{"id":"conduct","title":"Conduct","kind":"list"},{"id":"record","title":"Signed file review","kind":"json"}],"samples":[{"n":1,"id":"ca-auto-planted","title":"Ca auto planted","deep_link":"/tools/finance/claims-conduct-pack?sample=1&autorun=0"},{"n":2,"id":"ca-home-clean","title":"Ca home clean","deep_link":"/tools/finance/claims-conduct-pack?sample=2&autorun=0"},{"n":3,"id":"tx-home-lowball","title":"Tx home lowball","deep_link":"/tools/finance/claims-conduct-pack?sample=3&autorun=0"},{"n":4,"id":"tx-auto-clean","title":"Tx auto clean","deep_link":"/tools/finance/claims-conduct-pack?sample=4&autorun=0"},{"n":5,"id":"naic-auto-noclause","title":"Naic auto noclause","deep_link":"/tools/finance/claims-conduct-pack?sample=5&autorun=0"},{"n":6,"id":"ca-home-notices","title":"Ca home notices","deep_link":"/tools/finance/claims-conduct-pack?sample=6&autorun=0"}],"deep_link_params":{"sample":"1-based index into samples, or a sample id","autorun":"1 = start the run once the sample is loaded; 0 (default) = only preselect","reduce-motion":"1 = turn off animations"}},"api":{"base":"https://api.decosa.ai","contract":"/api/contract.json","contract_markdown":"/api/contract.md","reference":"/docs/api","keys":"/account/keys"},"prompts":{"hosted":"/prompts/claims-conduct-pack-hosted.md","selfhost":"/prompts/claims-conduct-pack-selfhost.md","assemble":"/prompts/claims-conduct-pack-assemble.md","mac":null},"rehearsal":{"bundle":"/samples/claims-conduct-pack.zip","bundle_url":"https://decosa.ai/samples/claims-conduct-pack.zip","folder":"/samples/claims-conduct-pack/","expected":"/samples/claims-conduct-pack/expected.json","files":["/samples/claims-conduct-pack/expected.json","/samples/claims-conduct-pack/inputs/claim.json","/samples/claims-conduct-pack/inputs/documents.json","/samples/claims-conduct-pack/inputs/policy.json"],"bytes":3830,"checks":["the late acknowledgement is flagged","its deadline is 15 calendar days after the first notice","the denial reason that misstates Exclusion 4 is flagged","the flag quotes the policy line it was checked against","the missing Department of Insurance review notice is flagged","the signed file review verifies","a file review with its flag count changed no longer verifies","every model call has a signed receipt"],"licence":"Synthetic: Harbor Oak Mutual, its policy forms and every person are invented (scripts/claims_cases.py). Part of decosa-api, AGPL-3.0-or-later.","about":"A synthetic California auto claim file (first notice, adjuster log, denial letter) and its policy. Planted: the claim was acknowledged 29 days after notice (the limit is 15), the denial letter says Exclusion 4 excludes loss at excessive speed when the policy excludes organized races and speed contests, and the letter has no Department of Insurance review notice. All three must be flagged, with the deadline computed and the policy line quoted, and the signed file review must verify.","run":{"containers":"docker compose exec api python scripts/rehearse.py claims-conduct-pack","checkout":"python scripts/rehearse.py claims-conduct-pack --bundle claims-conduct-pack.zip --base-url http://127.0.0.1:8445","mac":".venv/bin/python scripts/rehearse.py claims-conduct-pack"},"guidance":"Set up with a coding agent (we recommend Claude Code with Claude Opus 5.5; any capable coding agent works) on mock data only, run the rehearsal until every check passes, then run your own data locally yourself. Never give the agent real data during setup."},"hardware_fit":{"check":"/self-host/hardware?use=claims-conduct-pack","data":"/api/hardware.json","tiers":[{"id":"lite","gpu_gb":40,"basis":"estimate","unknown":[]},{"id":"standard","gpu_gb":57.6,"basis":"stack","unknown":[]},{"id":"best","gpu_gb":192,"basis":"stack","unknown":[]},{"id":"wanted","gpu_gb":384,"basis":"estimate","unknown":[]}],"mac":null},"links":{"page":"/tools/finance/claims-conduct-pack","json":"/use-cases/claims-conduct-pack.json","metrics":"/metrics/claims-conduct-pack","console":"/tools/finance/claims-conduct-pack","console_sample":"/tools/finance/claims-conduct-pack?sample=1&autorun=0","stack":"/tools/finance/claims-conduct-pack#stack","try_live":"/tools/finance/claims-conduct-pack","watch":"/tools/finance/claims-conduct-pack","build":"/tools/finance/claims-conduct-pack#build","self_host":"/tools/finance/claims-conduct-pack#self-host","prompts":{"hosted":"/prompts/claims-conduct-pack-hosted.md","selfhost":"/prompts/claims-conduct-pack-selfhost.md","assemble":"/prompts/claims-conduct-pack-assemble.md","mac":null}}}